DARK OCCULT ART: Boston’s New MLK Statue Is An Obscenity, By Design
Martin Luther King, Jr., and The Unspeakable
“Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art.” - Leonardo da Vinci
“Modern art is an embarrassment.” - Jadrien Hernandez
$ $ $ $ $ $
Only an anti-black racist could love Boston’s wretched new Martin Luther King, Jr., sculpture.
Entitled “The Embrace” and ostensibly a bronze re-creation of an allegedly famous photo of MLK hugging his long-suffering widow Coretta when he won the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize, it’s memorable in all the worst ways and clearly another degenerate Sign O’ The Times during our slow-rolling American Apocalypse.
One of the most impressive things about sculptor Hank Willis Thomas’s reportedly $10 million piece of anti-art that got unveiled over the weekend in vvitchy ol’ New England is how “The Embrace” looks obscene no matter what angle you observe it. It’s just a question of which public obscenity we’re talking about.
Is it a pair of hands holding a massive cock? Or maybe a huge turd? Is it a guy going down on a woman, or vice-versa? A person with a head up their own ass? Really, as a diverse swarm of social media observers — including members of the King family —have pointed out, the possibilities are numerous and the mind boggles.
MLK’s mind, by the way, is not part of the sculpture, which is headless. Decapitated, like John the Baptist or Jayne Mansfield. His heart’s not there either, as the piece only depicts arms and shoulders, which helps to explain why this damned thing looks so soulless. It’s only about the physical body, not the intellectual mind nor the heart of love.
Who paid for this thing? Who’s behind it? The City of Boston, like all American governments, isn’t transparent about this controversial issue and doesn’t really want you to know who footed the $10 million. Boston’s back-patting website for the sculpture says only that it was a “public-private partnership,” without a whiff of detail how much of the money came from taxpayers’ dollars.
But we do know from the website that the sculpture was “initiated by entrepreneur Paul English,” predictably a billionaire white guy tech entrepreneur, computer scientist and philanthropist who made his money by being co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of the online travel booking site Kayak.
According to his Wikipedia biography, English suffers from a variety of mental illnesses, including hypomania and depression, and is on a bunch of psychiatric drugs. He’s also got a close eye on Haiti’s children, launching a non-profit network of 41 schools on the poverty stricken half-island Voodoo nation where parents sell their kids into sex slavery, and so he definitely deserves to be complimented on that level of philanthropic engagement with black people, and you can do what you will with that observation.
Anyway, this latest sculpted insult to conquered America and the ever-beleaguered black community and art itself brings me right ‘round to my afore-mentioned Rule of Three, as the destruction, degradation and dumbing down of art is increasingly being glorified in American and Western culture (or, more appropriately, anti-culture).
Before I get to the examples, here’s why it’s happening.
In 1958, researcher, analyst and former (“former”?) FBI agent Cleon Skousen’s book The Naked Communist laid out a list of 45 Communist goals for its minions in the relentless long march to conquer the United States of America.
The whole list is worth knowing, because it might prove a decent wakeup call for all that we see in contemporary America, where every day brings a new demoralizing insult. But for our purposes here, we’ll focus on numbers 22 through 25:
22. Discredit American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings," substituting shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
You cannot have beautiful or elevating or spiritual art in a culture you are determined to demoralize and destroy. You have to invert everything, you must insist ugly is beautiful and stupid is clever and obscene is natural and debased is profound.
That’s why you see all the controlled corrupt collectivist critics in corporate media praising “The Embrace” like it’s the new Mona Lisa (and hold that thought!).
The Boston Globe deemed it “a tribute to love, justice and the unsung.” The New York Times says “It honors Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Legacy.” Architectural Digest raves that the sculpture is “striking” and “captures the feeling of love.”
But does it? All contemporary trends in art and entertainment say the opposite is far more likely true, and intentionally so.
The biggest trend in the art world right now is actually the destruction of art. All the biggest art world news stories in the past couple months have been devoted to the destruction of art, not the creation of it. This destruction is encouraged and promoted by the people who should be protecting it, which is one element that not enough people have recognized.
Look to the actions in the past few months of the useful idiots in the Just Stop Oil movement and others, who’ve spray painted and thrown tomato soup, mashed potatoes and other objects at timeless classic paintings from Claude Monet, Johannes Vermeer, Vincent Van Gogh, etc.
Are these destructive people being punished? Not really, no. They’re found guilty of property destruction, but don’t get sent to jail; they get fined a couple hundred bucks, which will surely be paid by whoever’s really backing them, or the headline says they’ve been sentenced but when you actually read the story you find out the sentence was suspended.
Moreover, why aren’t these criminals being stopped in the first place? If you look at video of these attacks upon art, you’ll notice that everybody involved is pretty blatant — they wear bright orange or yellow vests, or white t-shirts with “JUST STOP OIL” blazoned on them. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out the perps before they become perpetrators of this perversion, yet they keep getting away with it.
That’s because the destruction of art and beauty is being encouraged by the people running these art galleries, and whoever they answer to. They want you to see the destruction of timeless creativity as a heroic act as a Great Reset creates a New World Order for Modern Audiences.
Lunatic dark occult auteur Rian Johnson feels the same, and delivers the third point in this triangle of sadness. In Glass Onion, his very bad and proudly stupid new Netflix sequel to Knives Out that was crapped out at the end of 2022, Reeee-Anne J. gleefully depicts the destruction of da Vinci’s Mona Lisa as an act of heroism: The film’s nutcase heroine races across a dangerous blazing room to outpace the movie’s evil murdering technobillionaire philanthropist, in order to raise the protective shields around what’s arguably the best-known piece of art on the planet. She succeeds, and the audience is supposed to cheer as we watch the profound perennial painting burn to ash before our eyes.
As a contrast, 20 years ago in 2002, Hollywood depicted the burning of the Mona Lisa as a signifier of a world gone to hell, in Kurt Wimmer’s dystopian science fiction action picture Equilibrium, starring Christian Bale (that movie’s also got an, uh, interesting take on vaccinations, which is probably one of several reasons nobody in corporate media talks about it much anymore; a lot of its content makes their masters nervous).
It’s worth noting that the very evil and anti-art Glass Onion won last night’s Critics Choice Award for “Best Comedy,” which just goes to show how stupid, shallow and corrosive the worldview of most so-called “film critics” are nowadays. As I’ve told you before, they aren’t critics: They’re merely reviewers (“This happens, then this happens, then THIS happens!”), but maybe they’re even less than that. Maybe they’re not just unable to recognize quality; maybe they’re conspiring against it!
As for “less than that,” there’s little that’s “less than that” than the really bad Boston “art” work “The Embrace.” Because not only is it terrible in the exoteric sense, meaning that you can look at it and realize it sucks, it’s just as terrible in an esoteric way as well, because the subtext of the work is also a lie.
“The Embrace” seeks to present Martin Luther King, Jr., and Coretta Scott King as some kind of power couple, deeply devoted to each other, but the sad truth of the matter is that MLK was a huge philanderer, who cheated on his wife with dozens of women, at least 41 at most recent count.
This uncomfortable information has pretty much been deemed Unspeakable, as almost nobody in the controlled corrupt collectivist corporate media has reported it, but in 2019 the FBI began declassifying reports about their secret recordings of MLK in the 1950-60s and it’s some pretty ugly stuff.
FBI had been clandestinely recording King in hotel rooms as he traveled, beginning in 1955 and continuing until he was assassinated by the US government in 1968 (hey, don’t call me a “conspiracy theorist” — the courts decided that).
According to David Garrow, who wrote the 1987 Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of King, Bearing the Cross, FBI hotel room recordings reveal King was not only a Baptist preacher but also “a sexual libertine who laughed as a forcible rape took place.”
Don’t take my word for it. According to a 2019 Business Insider article, a rare mainstream publication that reported on Garrow’s writings, and citing U.K. media coverage:
“…a memo accompanying the tape alleges King "looked on and laughed" as a pastor of Baltimore's Cornerstone Baptist Church raped a woman in the hotel room. The pastor died in 1991.
The FBI documents say King had a conversation in which he "discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts," The [London] Times wrote, citing Garrow's article.
"When one of the women protested that she did not approve, the Baptist minister immediately and forcibly raped her," The Times wrote, quoting the FBI documents.
Garrow wrote that the FBI agents did not intervene during the alleged rape.
I had originally included much more from Garrow’s article on the FBI report, but removed it because I don’t want to appear gratuitous. If you want a more detailed summation without reading the Garrow article, German-owned Business Insider gives you a pretty detailed rundown. If you want Garrow’s entire account, it’s here.
There is one paragraph from the Insider article that deserves mentioning, however, because of the new Boston sculpture. Garrow’s article claims one of the hotel recordings catches King telling someone in his hotel room that he launched the "International Association for the Advancement of Pussy Eaters.”
You might wonder if the artist who made “The Embrace” was aware of that claim.
Though the FBI documents have been declassified and are right there for you to read in the U.S. National Archives, the actual tape recordings of King are scheduled to be released to the public in 2027, four years from now. Maybe we’ll end up discovering it was all a lie, like so much we’ve learned about the gloried history of the FBI has turned out be lies. But they convinced Garrow, and Garrow — until he wrote about the FBI recordings, at least — was considered a highly credible and respected historian and biographer.
But it’s also worth considering if ugly anti-art like “The Embrace” (and before that the almost equally derided “Caucasian MLK” Memorial in Washington, D.C., where the inscription on the Memorial was a misquote) is actually a sinister effort to mock the man, before the final rug pull comes in 2027. Perhaps they’re setting the stage, because the whole world’s one. And Martin Luther King, Jr., as it turns out, was apparently a major player.
Let's accept for a moment that satanic temple is just a mechanism for freedom and the satan part is a meme they exploit to that end. I poked around after seeing your banner by them and saw what you circled is real and true. They had another event that required vaxx proof, no exceptions. That from a place that says this: The mission of The Satanic Temple is to encourage benevolence and empathy among all people, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense and justice, and be directed by the human conscience to undertake noble pursuits guided by the individual will.
The three dimensional lack of sense in our society is unfathomable.
Valuable insights Thank you.
This kind of info describing deeply disturbing alleged paradoxes of public identities (elites as well as commoners), especially religious, always brings to mind what I’ve learned about mkultra type trauma programming which is touted to be centuries long employed by elites on their own children.. There are published claims (ie. Fritz Springmeier) that early childhood mkuktra programming can create a totally undetectable “mind controlled slave” with fragmented identities often into the 100s which can be “programmed” to carry out all sorts of unspeakable things. These identities are supposed to be hidden from the core person between amnesia barriers (!). So we end up with the godly pastor leading the choir not realizing he’s moonlighting as a satanic priest raping children and doing child sacrifice in the church basement - and worse.
I’m gathering this is the Luciferian clan big go-to game for building their society/army and fulfilling their final agendas.
I pray this is not true of MLK or anyone else. But I'm increasingly afraid the possibilities may be endless. 🙏