THE KING IS DEAD: W.E.F. Stalwart, Princess-Killer & Pedophile-Pal Charles III Is One Evil Motherfocker

"We Mean It, Man"

She was the media’s modern golden goddess, surrounded by monsters. Her second son isn’t Chuck’s, either, which, when you think about it, explains a lot!

“Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles, Zuckerberg and Gates / Tell us that we have to wait / But no more for them as well / ‘Causes they’re staring at the gates of hell…” - Van Morrison, “(No More) Money From America”

“Charles, don't you ever crave / To appear on the front of the Daily Mail / Dressed in your Mother's bridal veil?” — The Smiths, “The Queen is Dead”

$ $ $ $ $ $

I’m not sure what I’m going to be doing this weekend, but I can tell you one thing for sure I’m NOT going to be doing: Watching evil pedophilenabler and probably worse than that King Charles III take his vile vomitous vainglorious victory lap.

Yup, yup. One of the worst people on the planet is going to be coronated (hmmmm…corona-ted?) as King of the British Empire on Saturday, which the controlled corrupt collectivist corporate criminal clown media tells you is mostly a ceremonial position, but I assure you (again) that is not the case, and hold that thought.

Before we get to that, though, I’ll also rerun how King Charles III has been King since last September, when Queen Elizabeth officially croaked. But he’s almost surely been King longer than that, because all signs and symbols say Queen Elizabeth unofficially started her dirt nap sometime between October 14th, 2019, and December 19th, 2019. 

October 2019 (left) was the last time Queen Elizabeth II was seen wearing ornamental clothing or jeweled headwear signifying her Royal standing. Beginning in December 2019, the Queen would only appear in public looking like a wealthy old lady. She never again appeared in public as the Queen.

As I’ve pointed out before, October 14th, 2019, was the last time Queen Elizabeth was seen wearing The Royal Crown or State Diadem upon her head, signifying her reign. She sported it during October’s annual Queen’s Speech in the “before Covid” times.

After that, in the nearly three years before her death was formally announced on September 8, 2022, there were numerous official Royal events where the Queen should have literally dutifully worn The Crown or Diadem as a symbol and signifier of Royal Authority. 

And yet on December 19th, 2019, when Queen Elizabeth spoke at the annual opening of Parliament, there was no Crown or Royal Diadem. This was unprecedented. Never happened before. Moreover, the Queen arrived at Parliament by Bentley, not a horse-drawn carriage (also never before!), and wore a flowery day dress instead the previously requisite ceremonial robes (aaaaand…never before!). 

The Queen was not seen in The Crown or State Diadem again after the Queen’s Speech of October, 2019. The Royal PR flacks addressed questions about The Crown, saying it had become too heavy for the nonagenarian to wear on her doddering head. But they never answered any questions about why no Royal Diadem at important State events, and they certainly did not deign to reply to questions about the significance of the Queen not wearing any indicator of her reign for nearly three years. Not that I’m aware they got any questions about it, other than mine, by email, which was of course ignored.

After the Queen presumably died somewhere between October and December, 2019, the public heard, for the first time, the term “The Great Reset.” It came from then-“Prince” Charles, in January 2020, after being introduced by Nazi bloodline Bond villain Klaus Schwab at the annual World Economic Forum hooker-magnet confab of creeps, criminals, queers & crony capitalists in demonic Davos, Switzerland. 

“Signs & Symbols Rule the Word, Not Rules nor Laws.” - Confucius.

In January, 2020, “Prince” Charles was symbolically “crowned” as King of the World (Economic Forum), under a gay rainbow halo, as he introduced The Great Reset and delivered a smug and self-righteous speech (YouTube comments turned off!) in which he declared “It is not a lack of capital that is holding us back but rather the way in which we deploy it. To move forward, we need nothing short of a paradigm shift.” 

“Deploy” is often used as a military term, and it corresponds nicely with King Charles III’s proclamation that a "vast military-style campaign" is required to marshal a "fundamental economic transition” to implement the Great Reset.

It’s certainly what the world of finance has become for the W.E.F. types: A weapon against those who do not fall in line with the King of the World (Economic Forum)’s vision. Or, in other words: ESG, CRT, DEI (DIE?), DOA. The forces of the unnatural Hidden Hand concocted to pervert and supplant the Natural Law logic of Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand of pure, not crony, capitalism. 

King Charles III is a significant weapon for the W.E.F., too. The Royal Family is most certainly not some toothless, archaic, past-tense Crown clown show kept around for tourism purposes and to help drive love/hate/jealousy/gossip clicks, as the corrupt corporate media constantly tells you. 

Thus, let’s get crazy and break a few U.K. laws. Did you know it is against the law to advocate the abolition of the Monarchy in the UK? Like almost every other thing, controlled corporate media has misled the public into believing that kindly (ha!) Queen Elizabeth II and now King Charles III were and are merely symbolic ceremonial figureheads, with little or no real power.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

As British Monarch, King Charles III is now one of the wealthiest and most powerful people on Earth. Don’t listen to the bought-and-paid-for subjects in corporate media about the Royal Family’s alleged liquid assets; they own more land than anybody on the planet — or, pardon me, the “Royal Trust” does — with more than 6.6 BILLION acres of land (six-point-six! You can’t make this shit up), including Britain and 31 Commonwealth nations still possessed by Britain, which nobody really talks about because they don’t want you to know or understand.

But understand this: King Charles is no figurehead. He’s the KING. He’s a MONARCH. A monarch reigns, but does not rule. A monarch gets other people to do the ruling; he possesses all the power but gets the chess pieces moved without moving them himself. The throne behind the power, to invert a phrase.

Prime Ministers in Commonwealth nations, like Canada’s pretty boy communist cretin Justin Castrudeau or Australia’s awful Anthony Albanese, are subservient to the King. They are basically his spokespeople flunkies to the public. The governor generals stationed in the King’s commonwealth nations represent and exercise the King’s power on his behalf. Did you even know that something like a Governor General who serves the reigning King or Queen exists? Probably not, because they don’t want you to.

Is there a more punchable face among the death cult’s pervert puppetry than Castrudeau? The smug psychopathy is beyond triggering.

All Canadian warships and Australian warships belong to the King. All government contracts are between a company or individual, and “His Majesty.” All media is under his control, and The Crown can squelch any story it wants. 

The general public does not realize that Commonwealth nations’ leaders are only representatives of the Monarch. They do not possess the power. They exercise the power. In other words, they do not reign — they rule.

By delegating the power instead of exercising it, the King remains safely above and outside petty political conflicts, divisions, and disputes. He is protected from becoming a target of political hostility. Meanwhile, the general public is kept in the dark about the powers that the King possesses — possesses, but we’re told does not exercise. Yet…do you know anybody with that much power who doesn’t use it?

Now, what is “The CROWN”?

“The Crown” refers to the executive powers exercised in the name of the Monarch. The physical crown is a symbol of the King’s executive office. The Parliamentary Oaths Act of 1866 requires all leaders of Commonwealth nations to swear an Oath of Loyalty to the King, not to the people who elected them. Those who do not swear allegiance are deemed unfit for office.

This doesn’t just mean Prime Ministers. It means police, military, judges, legislators, lawyers, and public servants. Public land in the Queen’s colonies like Canada is called “Crown Land.” Government corporations are called “Crown Corporations.” The central bank of Canada and the Canadian Mint are Crown Corporations, independent of most government controls.

Yet that’s apparently not enough for King Charles III. In a “controversial change” for 2023, instead of merely the requisite officials and functionaries swearing an oath to serve King Charles, the new King has informed the British public that they should take that oath, too. 

What has been traditionally called the "homage of the peers" has been “reimagined” as a "homage of the people” for “modern audiences,” with King Charles III expecting the British people to recite, on the day of his corona-tion (corona-nation?) "I will pay true allegiance to your majesty and to your heirs and successors according to law. So help me God."

Yeah, no. Fuck that and fuck you, Chuck. 

I’m not going to sit here and write that the newly coronated King of the British Empire is a psychopathic child rapist, but I will note that he certainly has a knack for hanging out with psychopathic child rapists, including his brother, Jeff Epstein’s pal Prince Andrew. And pedophile/necrophile Jimmy Savile. And former Church of England Bishop Peter Ball (aptronym!), who was convicted of sexually abusing 18 teens and young men; then-Prince Charles bought Ball a house to live in, which he tried to hide by using the Duchy of Cornwall to purchase the property. There are others, too, but we’ve already hit the Rule of Three and it’s a pretty formidable trio.

The Bishop was bad enough, and Prince Andrew is an idiot unto himself, but Jimmy Savile, yikes. I’ve written about Savile in the past, but to quickly recap: Dude who raped kids and fucked corpses spent lots of quality time with then-Prince Charles, was Knighted by the Royal Family even as reporters at his own BBC network were investigating him and then getting murdered (unsolved). After he died, all the terrible stuff gossiped about Savile while he was alive became public — hundreds, if not thousands, of tween and teen girls raped! Hospital morgues pillaged for corpse-sex (corpsex?)! — causing an irate UK public to demand Savile’s Knighthood be revoked. The Royal Family didn’t even deign to respond, much less do anything about it. The late “Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile, OBE KCSG” remains how the child rapist is formally known. 

Nor will I sit here and write that King Charles had his dreamy ex-wife murdered, but I will note that Diana Spencer wrote in a letter to her former butler that Charles and his family were planning to murder her in a car crash, 10 months before that exactly happened on August 31, 1997. 

Hopefully you’re not one of those guileless innocents who believes the car crash that killed Diana Spencer and maybe the baby she was allegedly carrying, plus definitely her BF Dodi al Fayed and chauffeur Henri Paul, was your normal, natural Mediagasm tragedy.

If so, I cannot more strongly suggest you watch the documentary Unlawful Death, which will quickly dissuade you of your Royal naiveté. Unlawful Death was once one of the most censored videos on the internet, I literally had to have somebody send me a burned DVD through the mail in late 2011 because Gmail and Yahoo would block it in an email attachment. But now that everybody’s gotten away with murder, Unlawful Death is easily found on YouTube and elsewhere, just another Freeze/Thaw Revelation of the Method to mock the plebs, feebs and dipshits. 

A decade or so ago, many photos of Diana Spencer after the Paris car accident began to appear on the internet, on Reddit and the ‘chans and a few other outlaw-ish platforms back when they were still outlaw-ish. This is the only one I can find now, it’s much more mild than several of the others, including one I’ll never forget with her hands pressed against the car window, eyes in terror, pleading for help. There were at least a dozen photographers at the accident (crime?) scene, taking hundreds (thousands?) of pictures. All have been censored, along with those notorious French photos of Diana at the topless beach shortly after the divorce.

I also highly recommend this episode of Truthstream Media, an indie journalism husband-and-wife team here in Austin (I think), who used to work for Alex Jones & Infowars but left/got forced out when they started getting too much attention for Jones to tolerate. And we all know how much Alex Jones likes being the center of attention…Except when it comes to his relationship with the recently-outed same sex groomer and Karl Rove protégé Ali Akbar Alexander. Don’t ask A.J. about that! (or Owen Shroyer, as I found out the hard way). 

The Truthstream Media video does an excellent job putting old new King Charles III’s reign into perspective through hundreds of years of British history, particularly King Charles I and King Charles II’s tenures. Neither of them worked out well for the freedom, independence or autonomy of the British people and one of them actually got overthrown and ended up jailed. Though the video delves pretty hard into speculation in its last 20 minutes, the historical stuff and comparisons of speeches and pronouncements from “The King of the World” (Economic Forum) are undeniably factual and important for anyone trying to suss out what’s coming next. 

The craziest thing about all this is that the bloodline that reigns over England, from King Charles III all the way back to King George I in 1714, isn’t even the true British Royal bloodline. British Royalty got hijacked by the Germans centuries ago in a wicked usurper storyline that would require an entire separate column, but suffice to say the Royal Family you know as “the Windsors” is a LIE. They changed their name in 1917 during WWI because of all the anti-German sentiment. The real name of the current so-called “Royal Family” that reigns over the British Empire is Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. They ain’t British.

And where does that not-British German usurper bloodline go back to? Why, literally all the way back to crazy-ass Vlad the Impaler, no hype, no spin, no shit, no kidding: The blood-drinking tyrant who was the inspiration for Count Dracula. King Charles III has bragged about it — “I have Transylvania in my blood” — it’s no “conspiracy theory.”

It’s not a conspiracy theory either that King Charles waited for a corona-tion date that would take place during a Blood Moon Lunar Eclipse. Eclipses have been a big deal to Royalty for millennia, and arguably an even bigger deal during the Hidden Hand’s occultocracy coup right after the ultra-rare Blood Moon Eclipse of 2015, which signified “the end of the world as we know it.”   

Thus, now a bloodsucker’s bloodline sits on the throne of the British Empire. Though, to be fair, if you can believe David Icke and a few other de-occultists/paranoids, it’s nothing new. What’s new is the absence of even pretending to not be evil. What kind of King seemingly does not give a shit as his nation is over-run by illegal immigration, grooming gangs, historic church arsons, free-speech stifling control freaks, while being ostensibly led by a comic/horrific parade of incompetent if not flat-out evil political leadership? A wicked king. “Wicked King Wicker.”

I mean…if you really thought hard about it, you could realistically weigh whether King Charles III’s long life and dubious personal history might not be loaded with deeply debauched secrets that would make him easy low-hanging fruit for blackmail and manipulation, especially if it was served up with an extra entrée of flattery and accolades. 

But that’s Conspiracy Theory thinking! I’m sure we’ll all be okay. Just ask our aptronym ex-Princess, best known as “Lady Die.” O, wait.

“God save the Queen! / She ain’t no human being… / We mean it, man!”