“Something is very, very wrong. But we all know that, at least everybody here. The real question is: What are we going to do about it? Anything?”
Good question. I’ve been waiting for something since literally the 90s, like a clock is ticking down to an Ultimate Event. I still don’t know what. But despite everything that’s gone on it still feels premature to Do Something.
It feels premature because it's probably still a lone wolf kind of thing. And those ne'er go well. We need mass understanding of some corrupt event; Covid/vaxx almost got us there, but not over the line. Not sure what it will take. Thank you for your comment!
So Tom as you're so good at picking up the fakery all over the place I wonder why you're stuck on it for 9/11 dead and injured. It's soooo obvious there too. Here's a good video by FakeNukes Phil on the fake jumpers. https://www.bitchute.com/video/dtiCpmW8eve4/
After Aaron, I wrote a post, Are Self-Immolations a Thing? going back to the famous Buddhist monk in 1963 with references to others, not expecting a new one to pop up so soon. Didn't see that photo, it's a good one - https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/are-self-immolations-a-thing.
Jeff Bauman is really Nick Vogt who really did have his legs blown off in Afghanistan by an IED (or that's what we're told happened, could be true). His survival was a touch and go thing - so he lost his legs in a completely unjustified invasion just to return to participate in another event staged to justjfy those kinds of invasions. So disgusting. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nick-vogt-soldier-double-amputee-recovery_n_2082647
Covering up ONE or a couple deaths is one thing. Covering up thousands, requiring men to leave their wives and families, is another. Like I said before, I met and did my best to help devoted and heartbroken wives and mothers, "The 9/11 Widows," whose lives were shattered by the death of their spouse or son. I find it hard to grok that all these men abandoned their loving families for money. Maybe a few would've. Not all.
As for Nick Vogt, I had another (over)long section, at least another 1000 words, mostly about Vogt and the Tsarnaev brothers, but it was too digressive and made the piece more about Boston than Max Azzarello. But the photographic evidence comparing the two men is very difficult to dispute. This blog entry is loaded with good info:
I said I'd say no more on 9/11 before and I just did but, I promise, this is the last time so I will my case as cogently as possible.
1. There were not thousands of people faking death - while some alleged dead were real people many were simulated victims (vicsims) and some were probably simply agents assigned fake IDs - see Vicsim Report https://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9-11-9-the-Vicsim-Report.pdf. You can also simply take a look at the 9/11 memorials and notice a few anomalies yourself.
2. Your knowing people who allegedly lost people is perfectly consistent with expectations of a massive psyop such as 9/11 - there are probably hundreds of actors in this psyop
--- the ludicrous miracle survivors, notably Pasquale Buzzelli whose NY Mag story had me laughing hysterically - I notice in his YT interview, in reply to the first question about what his stresses were the night before the big event his reply was, "Losing at Fantasy Football." I think we can infer there was a reason he used the word "fantasy" here. http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/2003/n_9189/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZMpXlxQ024
--- April Gallop told us on her first day back after maternity leave (just happening to be 9/11) she was told to take her infant (who was supposedly injured) straight into her Pentagon office rather than to the creche, no reason given - really? She was one of the few who informed us that she saw no plane wreckage - an agent targeting the anticipated disbelievers of the story obviously. I noticed she made the Masonic devil's horns sign when giving a talk.
3. I had a discussion with an FDNY firefighter ("Jerms") who joined in 2004 and is friends with a firefighter who was allegedly interviewed for one of the 9/11 118 firefighter testimonies. I wondered how on earth any firefighter could read these testimonies and not notice that they are obviously fake Revelation-of-the-Method style when I could tell easily and know nothing about firefighting. However, when I asked Jerms to read them and to pick out his friend's to see if he could see anomalies he said he couldn't! I'm like you've got to be kidding me. Some of the things I thought were anomalies Jerms explained to me weren't, however, there are so many anomalies the few I was mistaken about make no difference. If people really died how can it be that there is not a single reference to any of the alleged 343 deaths of the firefighters' colleagues in these 118 testimonies and why are they all fake? Wouldn't there be some genuine recovery and rescue going on? For our discussion: https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/psyops-nobody-dies-nobody-gets-hurt/comment/52784488
So in summary:
1. Not thousands of real people faking death, a significant number of complete fakes
2. Knowing alleged loved ones is completely consistent with expectations of a massive psyop - in fact, I would find it strange if fake loved ones weren't pushed out, they need to be part of it. And what have all these loved ones achieved in 20 years? A big fat zero - also completely consistent with expectations.
"And what have all these loved ones achieved in 20 years? A big fat zero..."
I can't agree with that, though the victories proved pyrrhic, like getting Kissinger dumped as head of the 9/11 Commission, or its budget increased.
As for testimonies, we know from at least the JFK hit onward that the people who run those things are very good at taking out what does not serve their purpose.
I would love for you to be right, but don't think you are. I do appreciate your civil and diligent ongoing attempts to persuade without insult or distraction, along with the undeniable curiosities that lurk beneath the Official Story of various mass trauma Mediagasms.
I cannot swear that absolutely no one was killed, of course, there may have been deliberate targets or a few accidents. However, I'd bet everything I own and more that - in the vast majority of cases - the death and injury were staged. Actually, I forgot a part of my cogent argument.
From my post, Psyops: Nobody dies nobody gets hurt ... unless wanted - It's all about mind control
Amongst the disbelievers, do we all agree that 9/11 was essentially a demolition job? 9/11 was a demolition job. 9/11 was a demolition job. 9/11 was a demolition job.
What is standard practice in demolitions?
Standard practice is to FULLY evacuate the buildings and surrounding areas, not partly evacuate them.
Disbelievers mock the notion that high rise steel frame buildings came down by fire on the only day in history on 9/11. However, how about the notion that on the only day in history, demolition crews agreed to leave people in buildings and surrounding areas for the sake of a terror story … when the evidence clearly shows that people don’t need to be killed in order that we believe they were?
We’re told that Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI), a company proud of its four world records in large building demolition projects - three occurring in the three years before 9/11, Villa Panamericana & Las Orquideas, Puerto Rico (1998), J.L. Hudson Department Store, Chicago (1998) and the Seattle Kingdome (2000) - and its safety culture, presented a cleanup plan 11 days after the fateful day (note we’re told 11 days, not the date). You don’t think CDI might have played a major role in the demolitions themselves, do you?
And demolition crews were not the only people involved, of course, a significant number of people needed to be complicit or otherwise involved including agency staff, media personnel, corporations, the Port Authority and on and on.
Man those horse images really do something to me deep down, like some yearning for a different time. It is quite striking, particularly one of the other photos you linked. Thank you for the David McGowan link, what an incredible writer and I thought his death was suspicious also. I can’t believe we are living in such strange days, I hate it so much because I have children but other times I think wow we are going to really witness something big. I guess someone has to be around for the apocalypse, I just never thought it would be me.
Yes, the photographs of the horses, black & white & bloodied, strike some kind of primal resonance, and not in a good way.
Odd, though....no pix of any other horses? Just those two? No pix of any of the horses getting captured? Very little footage of the event other than 2-3 spots around the city, despite everybody having cell phones? One story I saw noted under an accompanying photograph how strange it was that the streets and sidewalks were mostly empty, even though it was the height of rush hour.
I was working with Dave McGowan to promote his paradigm-changing book WEIRD SCENES INSIDE THE CANYON when he was diagnosed with cancer and died soon thereafter. He was a distinctive and compelling author, gifted researcher, unique dot-connector. Since his death, some have told me he was CIA, which i find hard to believe, but "Center for an Informed America," certainly suggests a sly "in plain sight" revelation. That said, I'm the guy doing the "one eye" thing in an eyepatch in his bio photograph, so who am I to say.
I know most things are fake but the moon landings weren't and where there's a rare true event that's easy to find implausible those in power will, of course, not miss an opportunity to encourage those who tend to disbelieve them Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf style to disbelieve them in order to undermine them when they call out the real lies.
"I say “is” a spook, as he is said to have died on 11/22/15. That’s a spook date. Circumstances are, however, suspicious. I cannot locate them now, as they are not available anywhere. So rely on my memory, such as it is, and at your own risk. Prior to his death, maybe as early as 2014, he was doing interviews in which he chain smoked. In one, kind of bizarre, he was wearing a bathrobe and kneeling. Later he announced he had lung cancer and was going to die. I view his heavy smoking as probably of TV cigarettes, even as he could do the real ones and still, death might easily elude him. Most people who smoke die of other stuff, respiratory issues, and also lung cancer. Just smoking, however, is not a death sentence. The whole McGowan weird scene strikes me as predictive programming. I guess it is fitting the the author of Weird Scenes fakes his own death, along with most everyone else in that book.
McGowan, who is sporting what I think of as a shit-eating grin in the photo above, ran a website called Center for an Informed America, or CIA for short. No comment."
An anonymous blog with only two entries, both devoted to debunking Dave McGowan, yet only after his death where he can no longer refute the writer's claim, is your white knight for truth about the moon landing?
Skimming through it, I immediately caught two deceptive misleading errors, one about the erased original footage (which the anonymous author misrepresents as McGowan claiming the footage is completely gone; not true) and the Dutch moon rocks (more nitpicking and goalpost moving; who cares if the U.S. Ambassador to Denmark reports to the State Department or not).
Dave McGowan had a long history of smoking, he mentions it in his earliest books and on his blog. I have not seen the interview in his bathrobe; if you ever find it, LMK. He also got mocked by a commenter on the CARAVAN TO MIDNIGHT podcast during the days after the Boston Marathon bombing, who suggested all his smoking was going to end up giving him cancer. He was diagnosed soon after.
Thank you again for your comment! I am glad you feel comfortable to speak freely here.
Good read - and thanks for the nudge to go read Dave McGowan's series on the Boston Marathon Bombing again; great stuff. (BTW: your title, and the image in the upper right of your opening montage reminded me of my favorite Christopher Lee movie...)
And amidst all of this, the NY post on April 24th, thought to reassure its readers that “seeing a demon in your room when you wake up is more common than you think”
Interesting. Was it you & I who were corresponding about "sleep paralysis," or was that someone else?
Also, there was this strange story a couple weeks back, which a very religious Catholic woman I know told me was actually the growing discernment of some spiritually in-tune men and women to see the demons who posses so many people around us.
Oh my goodness, that is so frightening!! I do d not explicitly discuss sleep paralysis. I only mentioned the Haunted Cosmos podcasts, and that I still haven’t listened to the episode they did on sleep paralysis (and maybe never will)
“Something is very, very wrong. But we all know that, at least everybody here. The real question is: What are we going to do about it? Anything?”
Good question. I’ve been waiting for something since literally the 90s, like a clock is ticking down to an Ultimate Event. I still don’t know what. But despite everything that’s gone on it still feels premature to Do Something.
It feels premature because it's probably still a lone wolf kind of thing. And those ne'er go well. We need mass understanding of some corrupt event; Covid/vaxx almost got us there, but not over the line. Not sure what it will take. Thank you for your comment!
So Tom as you're so good at picking up the fakery all over the place I wonder why you're stuck on it for 9/11 dead and injured. It's soooo obvious there too. Here's a good video by FakeNukes Phil on the fake jumpers. https://www.bitchute.com/video/dtiCpmW8eve4/
After Aaron, I wrote a post, Are Self-Immolations a Thing? going back to the famous Buddhist monk in 1963 with references to others, not expecting a new one to pop up so soon. Didn't see that photo, it's a good one - https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/are-self-immolations-a-thing.
Jeff Bauman is really Nick Vogt who really did have his legs blown off in Afghanistan by an IED (or that's what we're told happened, could be true). His survival was a touch and go thing - so he lost his legs in a completely unjustified invasion just to return to participate in another event staged to justjfy those kinds of invasions. So disgusting. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nick-vogt-soldier-double-amputee-recovery_n_2082647
What the hell is those horses?
Covering up ONE or a couple deaths is one thing. Covering up thousands, requiring men to leave their wives and families, is another. Like I said before, I met and did my best to help devoted and heartbroken wives and mothers, "The 9/11 Widows," whose lives were shattered by the death of their spouse or son. I find it hard to grok that all these men abandoned their loving families for money. Maybe a few would've. Not all.
As for Nick Vogt, I had another (over)long section, at least another 1000 words, mostly about Vogt and the Tsarnaev brothers, but it was too digressive and made the piece more about Boston than Max Azzarello. But the photographic evidence comparing the two men is very difficult to dispute. This blog entry is loaded with good info:
https://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr13.shtml
I thought you would've known about Nick Vogt.
I said I'd say no more on 9/11 before and I just did but, I promise, this is the last time so I will my case as cogently as possible.
1. There were not thousands of people faking death - while some alleged dead were real people many were simulated victims (vicsims) and some were probably simply agents assigned fake IDs - see Vicsim Report https://fakeologist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9-11-9-the-Vicsim-Report.pdf. You can also simply take a look at the 9/11 memorials and notice a few anomalies yourself.
2. Your knowing people who allegedly lost people is perfectly consistent with expectations of a massive psyop such as 9/11 - there are probably hundreds of actors in this psyop
--- the ludicrous miracle survivors, notably Pasquale Buzzelli whose NY Mag story had me laughing hysterically - I notice in his YT interview, in reply to the first question about what his stresses were the night before the big event his reply was, "Losing at Fantasy Football." I think we can infer there was a reason he used the word "fantasy" here. http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/2003/n_9189/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZMpXlxQ024
--- April Gallop told us on her first day back after maternity leave (just happening to be 9/11) she was told to take her infant (who was supposedly injured) straight into her Pentagon office rather than to the creche, no reason given - really? She was one of the few who informed us that she saw no plane wreckage - an agent targeting the anticipated disbelievers of the story obviously. I noticed she made the Masonic devil's horns sign when giving a talk.
3. I had a discussion with an FDNY firefighter ("Jerms") who joined in 2004 and is friends with a firefighter who was allegedly interviewed for one of the 9/11 118 firefighter testimonies. I wondered how on earth any firefighter could read these testimonies and not notice that they are obviously fake Revelation-of-the-Method style when I could tell easily and know nothing about firefighting. However, when I asked Jerms to read them and to pick out his friend's to see if he could see anomalies he said he couldn't! I'm like you've got to be kidding me. Some of the things I thought were anomalies Jerms explained to me weren't, however, there are so many anomalies the few I was mistaken about make no difference. If people really died how can it be that there is not a single reference to any of the alleged 343 deaths of the firefighters' colleagues in these 118 testimonies and why are they all fake? Wouldn't there be some genuine recovery and rescue going on? For our discussion: https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/psyops-nobody-dies-nobody-gets-hurt/comment/52784488
So in summary:
1. Not thousands of real people faking death, a significant number of complete fakes
2. Knowing alleged loved ones is completely consistent with expectations of a massive psyop - in fact, I would find it strange if fake loved ones weren't pushed out, they need to be part of it. And what have all these loved ones achieved in 20 years? A big fat zero - also completely consistent with expectations.
"And what have all these loved ones achieved in 20 years? A big fat zero..."
I can't agree with that, though the victories proved pyrrhic, like getting Kissinger dumped as head of the 9/11 Commission, or its budget increased.
As for testimonies, we know from at least the JFK hit onward that the people who run those things are very good at taking out what does not serve their purpose.
I would love for you to be right, but don't think you are. I do appreciate your civil and diligent ongoing attempts to persuade without insult or distraction, along with the undeniable curiosities that lurk beneath the Official Story of various mass trauma Mediagasms.
I cannot swear that absolutely no one was killed, of course, there may have been deliberate targets or a few accidents. However, I'd bet everything I own and more that - in the vast majority of cases - the death and injury were staged. Actually, I forgot a part of my cogent argument.
From my post, Psyops: Nobody dies nobody gets hurt ... unless wanted - It's all about mind control
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/psyops-nobody-dies-nobody-gets-hurt
Amongst the disbelievers, do we all agree that 9/11 was essentially a demolition job? 9/11 was a demolition job. 9/11 was a demolition job. 9/11 was a demolition job.
What is standard practice in demolitions?
Standard practice is to FULLY evacuate the buildings and surrounding areas, not partly evacuate them.
Disbelievers mock the notion that high rise steel frame buildings came down by fire on the only day in history on 9/11. However, how about the notion that on the only day in history, demolition crews agreed to leave people in buildings and surrounding areas for the sake of a terror story … when the evidence clearly shows that people don’t need to be killed in order that we believe they were?
We’re told that Controlled Demolition Inc (CDI), a company proud of its four world records in large building demolition projects - three occurring in the three years before 9/11, Villa Panamericana & Las Orquideas, Puerto Rico (1998), J.L. Hudson Department Store, Chicago (1998) and the Seattle Kingdome (2000) - and its safety culture, presented a cleanup plan 11 days after the fateful day (note we’re told 11 days, not the date). You don’t think CDI might have played a major role in the demolitions themselves, do you?
And demolition crews were not the only people involved, of course, a significant number of people needed to be complicit or otherwise involved including agency staff, media personnel, corporations, the Port Authority and on and on.
Great insight, as always. Thanks for always delivering.
I gotta say, the comments on your substack are also very fun to read. What a Motley Crew you have assembled. Reminds me of the Pequod.
Call me Ishmael.
Aye! "All my means are sane, 'tis my motive and my object mad."
Precisely.
Man those horse images really do something to me deep down, like some yearning for a different time. It is quite striking, particularly one of the other photos you linked. Thank you for the David McGowan link, what an incredible writer and I thought his death was suspicious also. I can’t believe we are living in such strange days, I hate it so much because I have children but other times I think wow we are going to really witness something big. I guess someone has to be around for the apocalypse, I just never thought it would be me.
Yes, the photographs of the horses, black & white & bloodied, strike some kind of primal resonance, and not in a good way.
Odd, though....no pix of any other horses? Just those two? No pix of any of the horses getting captured? Very little footage of the event other than 2-3 spots around the city, despite everybody having cell phones? One story I saw noted under an accompanying photograph how strange it was that the streets and sidewalks were mostly empty, even though it was the height of rush hour.
I was working with Dave McGowan to promote his paradigm-changing book WEIRD SCENES INSIDE THE CANYON when he was diagnosed with cancer and died soon thereafter. He was a distinctive and compelling author, gifted researcher, unique dot-connector. Since his death, some have told me he was CIA, which i find hard to believe, but "Center for an Informed America," certainly suggests a sly "in plain sight" revelation. That said, I'm the guy doing the "one eye" thing in an eyepatch in his bio photograph, so who am I to say.
Thank you for your comment!
Dave McGowan is/was an agent. Wagging the Moondoggie is a work of propaganda exposed by a blogger here: https://waggingthemoondoggiedebunked.blogspot.com/2018/08/wagging-moondoggie-part-1-debunked.html
I know most things are fake but the moon landings weren't and where there's a rare true event that's easy to find implausible those in power will, of course, not miss an opportunity to encourage those who tend to disbelieve them Boy-Who-Cried-Wolf style to disbelieve them in order to undermine them when they call out the real lies.
From https://pieceofmindful.com/2021/11/26/moondoggie-nobody-went-anywhere/
"I say “is” a spook, as he is said to have died on 11/22/15. That’s a spook date. Circumstances are, however, suspicious. I cannot locate them now, as they are not available anywhere. So rely on my memory, such as it is, and at your own risk. Prior to his death, maybe as early as 2014, he was doing interviews in which he chain smoked. In one, kind of bizarre, he was wearing a bathrobe and kneeling. Later he announced he had lung cancer and was going to die. I view his heavy smoking as probably of TV cigarettes, even as he could do the real ones and still, death might easily elude him. Most people who smoke die of other stuff, respiratory issues, and also lung cancer. Just smoking, however, is not a death sentence. The whole McGowan weird scene strikes me as predictive programming. I guess it is fitting the the author of Weird Scenes fakes his own death, along with most everyone else in that book.
McGowan, who is sporting what I think of as a shit-eating grin in the photo above, ran a website called Center for an Informed America, or CIA for short. No comment."
Thank you for your comment, buuuuuuut....
An anonymous blog with only two entries, both devoted to debunking Dave McGowan, yet only after his death where he can no longer refute the writer's claim, is your white knight for truth about the moon landing?
Skimming through it, I immediately caught two deceptive misleading errors, one about the erased original footage (which the anonymous author misrepresents as McGowan claiming the footage is completely gone; not true) and the Dutch moon rocks (more nitpicking and goalpost moving; who cares if the U.S. Ambassador to Denmark reports to the State Department or not).
Dave McGowan had a long history of smoking, he mentions it in his earliest books and on his blog. I have not seen the interview in his bathrobe; if you ever find it, LMK. He also got mocked by a commenter on the CARAVAN TO MIDNIGHT podcast during the days after the Boston Marathon bombing, who suggested all his smoking was going to end up giving him cancer. He was diagnosed soon after.
Thank you again for your comment! I am glad you feel comfortable to speak freely here.
Good read - and thanks for the nudge to go read Dave McGowan's series on the Boston Marathon Bombing again; great stuff. (BTW: your title, and the image in the upper right of your opening montage reminded me of my favorite Christopher Lee movie...)
And amidst all of this, the NY post on April 24th, thought to reassure its readers that “seeing a demon in your room when you wake up is more common than you think”
Feel reassured?
https://nypost.com/2024/04/24/lifestyle/demon-or-sleep-disorder-depends-on-who-you-ask/
Interesting. Was it you & I who were corresponding about "sleep paralysis," or was that someone else?
Also, there was this strange story a couple weeks back, which a very religious Catholic woman I know told me was actually the growing discernment of some spiritually in-tune men and women to see the demons who posses so many people around us.
https://people.com/rare-visual-disorder-see-demon-faces-prosopometamorphopsia-8619183
Thank you for your comment!
Oh my goodness, that is so frightening!! I do d not explicitly discuss sleep paralysis. I only mentioned the Haunted Cosmos podcasts, and that I still haven’t listened to the episode they did on sleep paralysis (and maybe never will)
Ahhhh, that's right. You were part of that discussion but not the instigator. Interesting timing on that NYPost story, for sure.
I haven't remembered a dream in a very long time. But I'm glad we are on the same page! Thank you for your comment!