While all the anomalies in Brigitte Macron's story do strongly suggest that she was born male I'm utterly mystified by the claim that Michelle Obama was. There are photos of her as a child and she looks like a girl. The notion that she is walking around with a penis bulge is simply ludicrous and to me this is simply a "conspiracy theory" - just like the moon landing hoax - pushed out to undermine people when they call out the real lies. Clothes can bulge in funny ways. This is not to say that she and her husband aren't totally involved in all kinds of shit - so many fake terror events happened under his presidency, including, of course, the notorious Sandy Hook.
It's always good to keep in mind that 1.7% of the population is born intersex (various forms) so someone can be born intersex without definitively being the sex opposite to what they seem. I've heard from numerous sources that Nicole Kidman was born intersex and, in fact, a girl in my class was born intersex (which I only found out later) as is someone I knew who was told by his doctor that he would never father a child - two years after a casual affair, a woman informed him that he was the father of her child so even though born intersex of some kind he still managed to father a child.
In Nicole Kidman's case, her being intersex is far less remarkable than the fact that her father, psychologist and academic, Antony Kidman, was part of a VIP satanic paedophile network and the main abuser of Fiona Barnett, from Engadine, Sydney who was hired out by her step-grandfather.
A while back, maybe on your first post about Kate Middleton I asked if anyone thought perhaps they had cloned her, and it’s taking a while for the programming to kick in, or they botched it.
No matter where I commented on cloning has anyone responded. I do believe many politicians are clones. So, I appreciate all your investigations, but will we ever know? Lol. I doubt it. Thanks for your hard work .
The plot thickens, Tom. I didn't even consider the possibility of Thomas Kingston's death being a fake - really slipping there - but your article got me thinking. Maybe it was although I wouldn't say the anomalies are thick on the ground which they usually are and some things that seem to be anomalies may not be.
--- "A spokesman for Gloucester Ambulance Service said they had attended a private residence in the Cirencester area."
Googlemaps tells us Gloucestershire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (note Gloucestershire not Gloucester) is "permanently closed" - http://alturl.com/nuaaj. Also, Cirencester has an ambulance station so why wouldn't the ambulance come from there?
--- A consultant histopathologist did the post mortem. This seems a little strange as histopathology is connected to disease. Wouldn't you expect more just a general forensic pathologist?
--- "Paramedics were called to the large, detached home at about 6pm." Why would "detached" be specified? They've already mentioned "country mansion" and "outbuilding" and where is the relevance? (This irrelevant and inappropriate piece of information is a very typical sign of a psyop I have to say.)
--- It seems redundant and inappropriate to report what the Coroner opened the inquest with, namely that Rule 23 of the Coroner's Inquest rules has been complied with. This rule relates to the acceptance of written evidence in the absence of people's attendance and one asks why the relevant people cannot attend and why the inquest is proceeding purely on the basis of written evidence as seems suggested. One might also wonder why there is an inquest at all - isn't it a straightforward suicide by gunshot? https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1616/made
We haven't been told what kind of gun, suggested reasons as to where the gun came from, how many shots, no suggestions AT ALL for why he suicided. Nada. That's the information we'd be expecting, not confirmation from the Coroner that an inquest rule has been complied with.
Actually, the more I think about it, the more ridiculous it seems.
I think they are punking us, yes! But, hahhahhaa, Tom, I just had to take a break reading your article to say that this sentence of yours just had me spellbound in a chuckle-y sort of way: "right before the wicked Wurlitzer cranks up some new tune for the two-legged sheeple to herk and jerk and twerk their never-ending zombie dance." What an image! Love your wordsmithing.
The picture is very weird. Without having known quite what some of the details were, the picture was off-putting in some manner. Maybe part of it is the children's mouths being wide open, especially the younger appearing boy. And the mom's arm-span seems a bit too big too. I know, she's tall and they're kids. Maybe they really are deliriously happy enough to have their mouths gaping open and maybe her wingspan is as long as her legs. Don't know, but looks odd.
Not sure if it was coincidence but your article sent my substack weird for a while, I was getting a 504 code?! Good read though.
Total change of subject:
I know you’re not completely sold on the moon rabbit hole but I happened across the Omega Psi Phi fraternity while searching up some space dudes. Insane initiations involving beating wannabe members with paddles. Bill Cosby was a member. Worthy of some further digging.
All of this space stuff seems to start around 1911-1918 with naval aviators and then develops again around 1955. Buzz Aldrin’s father was an aviator and he married Miss Moon 👀. This is when the Omega sci-fi fraternity kicks off too. And the federal reserve. And big pharma.
Another take I heard on the over the top doctored weird photo was to establish a pattern & they can claim photos are being doctored via AI when Epstein’s prince andrews pics come out. They couldn’t have been this stupid with the pic - their actions are always intentional & we’re always playing catch up. Btw - was macrons teacher documented as a woman at the age of 39? About what age would the switch have occurred?
When Kate appears after Easter, it will be easy for the demons and pedophiles to tell the normies, “Look how the truthers and the patriots make crazy things up! Here’s Kate now! Therefore you can’t believe them telling you we are demons and murderers and child rapists! They are crazy liars!”
Why did they pick Kate for the latest psy-op? She’s so visible. So well known. A good choice, by all accounts!
As for people who say the globalists are getting rid of the royals? Nah. They don’t eat their own.
For all we know, King Chuck is perfectly fine, too. We’re in the middle of deep, deep psy-ops, with deep, deep brainwashing and subterfuge. There is absolutely no way to tell what is real or not.
As a general rule, we should ignore their games. When Kate went missing, we should have all yawned and maybe spent more time worrying about important things, like our genocidal governments. Instead, on cue, we went right into acting like the imbeciles that we are and spend entire days chanting, “Where’s Kate?” rather than working diligently to prevent the demise of our families. See how this works?
There are days I wonder if we’re worth saving.
As for Candice—like many Patriots or truthers, she was good once. So was Oprah, so were many others. But somehow, the cabal gets to them. Yes, there’s blackmail, and big checks being written, but it’s more than that. There must be some kind of a documentary or document they are shown that feels indisputable and is so convincing, perfectly good humans turn. Entire bodies of Congress turn. Powerful people everywhere turn, and in sweeping numbers. Even those we once held in high esteem.
Is it some sort of a documentary showing an earth being blown to bits by an asteroid, or aliens.. and if humans don’t get it together…then this is your fate? But whatever it is, it works. Suddenly, a woman like Candice begins saying things that don’t gel any longer. Or a spiritual woman like Oprah becomes a billionaire suddenly and joins the cabal.
Something convinces good people to turn. They’re called to a meeting somewhere and shown “the truth” and suddenly they’re okay with genocide or pandemics or false flags or Hawaiian fires. However they’re being convinced, it must be extremely powerful.
Wow lots of info about the strange antics amiss among elites.
Of course its all actually very serious business.
And none of it a shock if you study the satanic “family” occult practices.
As you seem to know, it is asserted by insiders/survivors that all people on the world stage ($50 Million Klub) are multi-generational Luciferian elites.
Maybe you’ve read details of their religious practices…how sxl perversion plays a huge part.. how they’re strongly encouraged to sxly “vampirize” (pan-sxlz, fetishize, anything-goes) their children by age 10, as kult religious foundation.
Apparently the kids learn very early to enjoy pegging since thats a particular ritual priority to them. They believe this activity of assaulting the spinal base, is sacred, awakening kundalini demons to slither up the spine, infilling all chakras, to the brain and overtake the pineal gland, ie. demonic possession.
It traumatizes the children, causing “helpful” DID as part of trauma programming & total kontrol.
They believe this is spiritual empowerment & imperative for fulfilling their goals. They beg Lucifer for ever-increasing demonic possession, much the way born-again believers in Jesus ask YHWH God for the empowering indwelling of the sweet Holy Spirit, of course without the perversion.
From my reading about the “family” activities including royals, I suspect gossip about royal men pegged by strapped-on women is a beard game deflecting their actual practice of keeping several young male lovers… a common practice throughout antiquity.
Great article, as ever. On the D-notice / super-injunction part, speaking as someone who used to work in the newsroom of a British broadsheet, there were essentially four ways a story gets killed (I'm a few years out of date, but doubt things have changed much):
1. Super-injunctions: here one of the parties has to go to court, disclose the particulars and ask for the injunction to be issued usually on privacy grounds. It's almost never done for business of state because a DSMA notice is more direct and has no disclosure requirement. Very unlikely these would be used for royal business. The footballer Ryan Giggs is one of the better known examples after his name was raised in Parliament. It's a device for those who are rich but outside the protection of the system.
2. DSMA Notices: still very much part of the furniture, these are technically voluntary but in practice are always complied with. It's possible these may be used for royal business but they are supposed to be for national security related stories and any editor who thought the system was being abused would be in his rights to go around it.
3. Sexual assault laws: there is a lifelong right to anonymity for any victim of sexual assault. This has allegedly been abused in the past so that embarrassing acts by public figures are shielded for life, even when no charges were ever pressed (a statement by one of the parties to the police that the act was an assault is sufficient). It is a criminal offence to breach one of these - so the strongest possible deterrent, editors simply would not go around it. To my knowledge this device been employed by the families of senior political figures in the relatively recent past, who can tell with what degree of sincerity.
4. Gentleman's agreement: there are plenty of stories which are covered by a general omertà in the hope of access later on, or because it's felt somehow ungallant to dredge up a person's private life without public interest. There's a degree of 'play fair' here - so a cheating politician relying on this cannot pose in public with his family, as that then makes this fair game.
If I had to bet what was going on here, it would be 4, but neither 2 or 3 would surprise me. FWIW I don't get the impression that the newsrooms have any real idea of what's going on.
All that said, when any of these constraints are in place, the legacy press will often release apparently random stories without any obvious news value about the subject of the injunction / restraint / ban as a way of signalling to one another that they're in the know. I thought of that when seeing this the other day:
Maybe Royals have to marry men disguised as women, or at least infertile women, for some reason. Christopher Haden-Guest, 5th Baron Haden-Guest married Jamie Lee Curtis, who has been rumored to be a hermaphodite for decades. Ever since hearing this, I've always noticed how masculine her features are. Whenever I hear someone say how hot she was in X-movie, I always tell them about this.
Could it be that Thomas isn't dead and he and Kate have eloped somewhere?
Just to say that Candace is making that Masonic M sign (two middle fingers together, index and pinky splayed away) aka Triad Claw hand which dates back to at least the Renaissance
As you note, they give us the signs known as Revelation of the Method so the notion of "conspiracy theory" is ludicrous. They TELL us so there's no trouble at all knowing that 9/11 was an inside job. But what we can also know - but far fewer do - is that the death and injury were staged. Those in power have profiled us into two main groups: ~90% believers of their nonsense stories, ~10% disbelievers so with big psyops they often use this - really not too complicated - propaganda strategy.
Story A for the 90%: The terrrrorrrists / lone nut / virus did it
Story B for the 10%: The cabal did it
When the reality C is that Yes the cabal was responsible but what actually happened is not what we're told. It's not just the WHO that's different it's also the WHAT.
Just as they told us that they were responsible for 9/11 with their nonsense story that defies reality both physically and in terms of normal reality - catastrophic failure of the US multi-trillion dollar intelligence and military infrastructure at the hands of 19 ragtag terrrorrrists armed with boxcutters four times in one morning - they also told us very loud and clear that they didn't kill or injure people, for example, they had Cynthia McFadden outside the Bellevue Hospital and later the trauma centre specially set up for the event tell us, "No injured, no one being brought in, empty wheelchairs and gurneys!" The miracle survivor stories are ludicrous (typical feature of psyops). They bend over backwards to tell us it was simply a fancy drill. It's not that they won't kill people, of course, but generally when they tell us they're killing people they're not and when they tell us they're saving them ... they're killing them.
While all the anomalies in Brigitte Macron's story do strongly suggest that she was born male I'm utterly mystified by the claim that Michelle Obama was. There are photos of her as a child and she looks like a girl. The notion that she is walking around with a penis bulge is simply ludicrous and to me this is simply a "conspiracy theory" - just like the moon landing hoax - pushed out to undermine people when they call out the real lies. Clothes can bulge in funny ways. This is not to say that she and her husband aren't totally involved in all kinds of shit - so many fake terror events happened under his presidency, including, of course, the notorious Sandy Hook.
https://people.com/politics/michelle-obama-throwback-photos/
It's always good to keep in mind that 1.7% of the population is born intersex (various forms) so someone can be born intersex without definitively being the sex opposite to what they seem. I've heard from numerous sources that Nicole Kidman was born intersex and, in fact, a girl in my class was born intersex (which I only found out later) as is someone I knew who was told by his doctor that he would never father a child - two years after a casual affair, a woman informed him that he was the father of her child so even though born intersex of some kind he still managed to father a child.
In Nicole Kidman's case, her being intersex is far less remarkable than the fact that her father, psychologist and academic, Antony Kidman, was part of a VIP satanic paedophile network and the main abuser of Fiona Barnett, from Engadine, Sydney who was hired out by her step-grandfather.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT3NkHaNfMY
A while back, maybe on your first post about Kate Middleton I asked if anyone thought perhaps they had cloned her, and it’s taking a while for the programming to kick in, or they botched it.
No matter where I commented on cloning has anyone responded. I do believe many politicians are clones. So, I appreciate all your investigations, but will we ever know? Lol. I doubt it. Thanks for your hard work .
Yes distraction.. aka manipulation ..of hearts, minds, souls. thats serious business.
World leadership has been doing this to unwashed masses repeatedly since the beginning of time. People forget. 🙏
just saw this today. supposedly it's Kate walking around at a farm shop
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN5y_0tCOoI
I keep coming back to the comments in hopes that someone has something on the Queens “final Christmas” message.
That sounds crazy, and I admit I don’t remember that but totally believe it.
I only found this YouTube video claiming the Queen was put on house arrest after trying to expose the NWO in her2016 Christmas speech.
https://youtu.be/dqXh4qgVtuE?feature=shared
By the way, Tom, you keep mentioning this anarchapulco guru. You should do a post of all the things this guy said so it’s all in one place.
The plot thickens, Tom. I didn't even consider the possibility of Thomas Kingston's death being a fake - really slipping there - but your article got me thinking. Maybe it was although I wouldn't say the anomalies are thick on the ground which they usually are and some things that seem to be anomalies may not be.
I worked out the Kingston mansion is on Church Rd, Kemble, Cirencester (25m from Gloucester) although I can't quite locate it on googlemaps. (https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1089287)
Seeming anomalies:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/thomas-kingston-cause-death-everything-32226346
--- "A spokesman for Gloucester Ambulance Service said they had attended a private residence in the Cirencester area."
Googlemaps tells us Gloucestershire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (note Gloucestershire not Gloucester) is "permanently closed" - http://alturl.com/nuaaj. Also, Cirencester has an ambulance station so why wouldn't the ambulance come from there?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13145415/Thomas-Kingston-lady-Gabriella-Windsor-husband-shot-himself.html
--- A consultant histopathologist did the post mortem. This seems a little strange as histopathology is connected to disease. Wouldn't you expect more just a general forensic pathologist?
--- "Paramedics were called to the large, detached home at about 6pm." Why would "detached" be specified? They've already mentioned "country mansion" and "outbuilding" and where is the relevance? (This irrelevant and inappropriate piece of information is a very typical sign of a psyop I have to say.)
--- It seems redundant and inappropriate to report what the Coroner opened the inquest with, namely that Rule 23 of the Coroner's Inquest rules has been complied with. This rule relates to the acceptance of written evidence in the absence of people's attendance and one asks why the relevant people cannot attend and why the inquest is proceeding purely on the basis of written evidence as seems suggested. One might also wonder why there is an inquest at all - isn't it a straightforward suicide by gunshot? https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1616/made
We haven't been told what kind of gun, suggested reasons as to where the gun came from, how many shots, no suggestions AT ALL for why he suicided. Nada. That's the information we'd be expecting, not confirmation from the Coroner that an inquest rule has been complied with.
Actually, the more I think about it, the more ridiculous it seems.
I think they are punking us, yes! But, hahhahhaa, Tom, I just had to take a break reading your article to say that this sentence of yours just had me spellbound in a chuckle-y sort of way: "right before the wicked Wurlitzer cranks up some new tune for the two-legged sheeple to herk and jerk and twerk their never-ending zombie dance." What an image! Love your wordsmithing.
The picture is very weird. Without having known quite what some of the details were, the picture was off-putting in some manner. Maybe part of it is the children's mouths being wide open, especially the younger appearing boy. And the mom's arm-span seems a bit too big too. I know, she's tall and they're kids. Maybe they really are deliriously happy enough to have their mouths gaping open and maybe her wingspan is as long as her legs. Don't know, but looks odd.
Not sure if it was coincidence but your article sent my substack weird for a while, I was getting a 504 code?! Good read though.
Total change of subject:
I know you’re not completely sold on the moon rabbit hole but I happened across the Omega Psi Phi fraternity while searching up some space dudes. Insane initiations involving beating wannabe members with paddles. Bill Cosby was a member. Worthy of some further digging.
All of this space stuff seems to start around 1911-1918 with naval aviators and then develops again around 1955. Buzz Aldrin’s father was an aviator and he married Miss Moon 👀. This is when the Omega sci-fi fraternity kicks off too. And the federal reserve. And big pharma.
Weird world we live in.
The princess has stated she has cancer so she will not be seen indefinitely, anyone who is suspicious will be labeled as cruel. Thoughts?
Another take I heard on the over the top doctored weird photo was to establish a pattern & they can claim photos are being doctored via AI when Epstein’s prince andrews pics come out. They couldn’t have been this stupid with the pic - their actions are always intentional & we’re always playing catch up. Btw - was macrons teacher documented as a woman at the age of 39? About what age would the switch have occurred?
When Kate appears after Easter, it will be easy for the demons and pedophiles to tell the normies, “Look how the truthers and the patriots make crazy things up! Here’s Kate now! Therefore you can’t believe them telling you we are demons and murderers and child rapists! They are crazy liars!”
Why did they pick Kate for the latest psy-op? She’s so visible. So well known. A good choice, by all accounts!
As for people who say the globalists are getting rid of the royals? Nah. They don’t eat their own.
For all we know, King Chuck is perfectly fine, too. We’re in the middle of deep, deep psy-ops, with deep, deep brainwashing and subterfuge. There is absolutely no way to tell what is real or not.
As a general rule, we should ignore their games. When Kate went missing, we should have all yawned and maybe spent more time worrying about important things, like our genocidal governments. Instead, on cue, we went right into acting like the imbeciles that we are and spend entire days chanting, “Where’s Kate?” rather than working diligently to prevent the demise of our families. See how this works?
There are days I wonder if we’re worth saving.
As for Candice—like many Patriots or truthers, she was good once. So was Oprah, so were many others. But somehow, the cabal gets to them. Yes, there’s blackmail, and big checks being written, but it’s more than that. There must be some kind of a documentary or document they are shown that feels indisputable and is so convincing, perfectly good humans turn. Entire bodies of Congress turn. Powerful people everywhere turn, and in sweeping numbers. Even those we once held in high esteem.
Is it some sort of a documentary showing an earth being blown to bits by an asteroid, or aliens.. and if humans don’t get it together…then this is your fate? But whatever it is, it works. Suddenly, a woman like Candice begins saying things that don’t gel any longer. Or a spiritual woman like Oprah becomes a billionaire suddenly and joins the cabal.
Something convinces good people to turn. They’re called to a meeting somewhere and shown “the truth” and suddenly they’re okay with genocide or pandemics or false flags or Hawaiian fires. However they’re being convinced, it must be extremely powerful.
Wow lots of info about the strange antics amiss among elites.
Of course its all actually very serious business.
And none of it a shock if you study the satanic “family” occult practices.
As you seem to know, it is asserted by insiders/survivors that all people on the world stage ($50 Million Klub) are multi-generational Luciferian elites.
Maybe you’ve read details of their religious practices…how sxl perversion plays a huge part.. how they’re strongly encouraged to sxly “vampirize” (pan-sxlz, fetishize, anything-goes) their children by age 10, as kult religious foundation.
Apparently the kids learn very early to enjoy pegging since thats a particular ritual priority to them. They believe this activity of assaulting the spinal base, is sacred, awakening kundalini demons to slither up the spine, infilling all chakras, to the brain and overtake the pineal gland, ie. demonic possession.
It traumatizes the children, causing “helpful” DID as part of trauma programming & total kontrol.
They believe this is spiritual empowerment & imperative for fulfilling their goals. They beg Lucifer for ever-increasing demonic possession, much the way born-again believers in Jesus ask YHWH God for the empowering indwelling of the sweet Holy Spirit, of course without the perversion.
From my reading about the “family” activities including royals, I suspect gossip about royal men pegged by strapped-on women is a beard game deflecting their actual practice of keeping several young male lovers… a common practice throughout antiquity.
🙏
Great article, as ever. On the D-notice / super-injunction part, speaking as someone who used to work in the newsroom of a British broadsheet, there were essentially four ways a story gets killed (I'm a few years out of date, but doubt things have changed much):
1. Super-injunctions: here one of the parties has to go to court, disclose the particulars and ask for the injunction to be issued usually on privacy grounds. It's almost never done for business of state because a DSMA notice is more direct and has no disclosure requirement. Very unlikely these would be used for royal business. The footballer Ryan Giggs is one of the better known examples after his name was raised in Parliament. It's a device for those who are rich but outside the protection of the system.
2. DSMA Notices: still very much part of the furniture, these are technically voluntary but in practice are always complied with. It's possible these may be used for royal business but they are supposed to be for national security related stories and any editor who thought the system was being abused would be in his rights to go around it.
3. Sexual assault laws: there is a lifelong right to anonymity for any victim of sexual assault. This has allegedly been abused in the past so that embarrassing acts by public figures are shielded for life, even when no charges were ever pressed (a statement by one of the parties to the police that the act was an assault is sufficient). It is a criminal offence to breach one of these - so the strongest possible deterrent, editors simply would not go around it. To my knowledge this device been employed by the families of senior political figures in the relatively recent past, who can tell with what degree of sincerity.
4. Gentleman's agreement: there are plenty of stories which are covered by a general omertà in the hope of access later on, or because it's felt somehow ungallant to dredge up a person's private life without public interest. There's a degree of 'play fair' here - so a cheating politician relying on this cannot pose in public with his family, as that then makes this fair game.
If I had to bet what was going on here, it would be 4, but neither 2 or 3 would surprise me. FWIW I don't get the impression that the newsrooms have any real idea of what's going on.
All that said, when any of these constraints are in place, the legacy press will often release apparently random stories without any obvious news value about the subject of the injunction / restraint / ban as a way of signalling to one another that they're in the know. I thought of that when seeing this the other day:
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/sarah-rose-hanbury-duchess-cholmondeley-william-kate-b2510472.html
Maybe Royals have to marry men disguised as women, or at least infertile women, for some reason. Christopher Haden-Guest, 5th Baron Haden-Guest married Jamie Lee Curtis, who has been rumored to be a hermaphodite for decades. Ever since hearing this, I've always noticed how masculine her features are. Whenever I hear someone say how hot she was in X-movie, I always tell them about this.
Fantastic article, Tom!
Could it be that Thomas isn't dead and he and Kate have eloped somewhere?
Just to say that Candace is making that Masonic M sign (two middle fingers together, index and pinky splayed away) aka Triad Claw hand which dates back to at least the Renaissance
Renaissance paintings - https://europepmc.org/article/med/31910180
Modern day including Oprah - https://twitter.com/CoMembe9/status/1726959916836122645
As you note, they give us the signs known as Revelation of the Method so the notion of "conspiracy theory" is ludicrous. They TELL us so there's no trouble at all knowing that 9/11 was an inside job. But what we can also know - but far fewer do - is that the death and injury were staged. Those in power have profiled us into two main groups: ~90% believers of their nonsense stories, ~10% disbelievers so with big psyops they often use this - really not too complicated - propaganda strategy.
Story A for the 90%: The terrrrorrrists / lone nut / virus did it
Story B for the 10%: The cabal did it
When the reality C is that Yes the cabal was responsible but what actually happened is not what we're told. It's not just the WHO that's different it's also the WHAT.
Just as they told us that they were responsible for 9/11 with their nonsense story that defies reality both physically and in terms of normal reality - catastrophic failure of the US multi-trillion dollar intelligence and military infrastructure at the hands of 19 ragtag terrrorrrists armed with boxcutters four times in one morning - they also told us very loud and clear that they didn't kill or injure people, for example, they had Cynthia McFadden outside the Bellevue Hospital and later the trauma centre specially set up for the event tell us, "No injured, no one being brought in, empty wheelchairs and gurneys!" The miracle survivor stories are ludicrous (typical feature of psyops). They bend over backwards to tell us it was simply a fancy drill. It's not that they won't kill people, of course, but generally when they tell us they're killing people they're not and when they tell us they're saving them ... they're killing them.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-false-dilemma-propaganda