35 Comments
Sep 6·edited Sep 6Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Great piece again, Tom. It’s weird because I was just thinking about my first semester of college, back in the fall of 1979, and all the weird weird aspects of it. I was sorta contacted/recruited by this “Christian” campus group, which I was open to, because years earlier (long story) I had been an extremely devout Christian in the sorta long-haired liberal 70s sort of way, and having slid backwards for several years was very willing to jump back in with the right group of people. The leader of the group, who seemed sincere enough, but had a vibe I couldn’t quite figure out, invited me to his apartment to have a sincere talk. His apartment was icy cold and he sat on a stool directly in front of me, a little too close, and gave me this hard sell on Christianity, which he didn’t really have to do. I was freezing and he seemed as cold and expressionless as his stark, colorless apartment and the whole thing left me never wanting to have anything to do with him or his group again.

I was instead persuaded by my brilliant roommate, who went on to get a PhD in physics from CalTech, to embrace agnosticism, and he provided an example by being the most steadfastly moral human being I have ever encountered in my life.

Now well into middle age, I have returned to God. I regret ever leaving. But at the time I found it impossible to live up to my own standards of what a true follower of Christ should think and feel. Having Jerry Falwell and his cult burst upon the scene at that time didn’t help either. They did their best to destroy Christianity for millions of people.

Expand full comment
author

All those big televangeists of the late '70s/early '80s were comical then, look a lot more dangerous now. We used to get high on Sundays and watch Ernest Angley, the weirdest of them all, and about whom I decades later learned some horrible, horrible things.

There was a ton of homosexuality riddling many, if not all, of those televangelist empires. Jim Bakker got busted for it, and I worked with a really handsome guy at The Discovery Channel who'd gotten hire just after getting fired by another one of 'em, I wish I could remember who, because he was getting homosexually hassled by an exec and when he complained they made up some thing and got rid of him.

Thank you for your comment!

Expand full comment

When I'd go home from college in the 90's to my parents house in NE Ohio, I used to steal the remote control and leave the channel turned to Ernest Angsley just to annoy my parents. I didn't then and don't now understand how anyone would find him or his brand of christianity (lower case intentional for him) persuasive.

Expand full comment
author
Sep 9·edited Sep 10Author

It really is the power of television and mind control and the linguistic programming. Some people see it, some people don't, some people seemingly can't resist it. I bet I've been under somebody's spell a couple times in my life and didn't know it (and maybe still dont?).

Those were wild Sunday afternoons in West Virginia, watching Ernest Angley, we called him "Ernest Angry," he was such a furious preacher, the old fire & brimstone via rabbit ears and airwaves, except weirder than any of them. The dam finally burst on some of his secret life finally when a 1996 tape recording caught Angley admitting to sexual relations with a man. Many allegations of further sexual abuses, including forced vasectomies and abortions inside his religious empire, were reported by the Akron Beacon Journal and Forbes. He died in 2021, three months before what would've been his 100th birthday, disgraced and forgotten but as an asterisk on a sad period for Christianity that continues unto this day.

Expand full comment

This article reminds me that, as a boy, my ordinary desire of female companionship helped me steer clear of being pulled further into elements that might have kept me from escaping the cult I grew up in sooner.

Expand full comment
author

A Good Woman is one of the greatest gifts bestowed upon any man, and one of my deepest regrets is not realizing that earlier in my life. Thank you for your comment!

Expand full comment

Not sure how well it would work with a real buck goat and a woman. First, a goat's penis is the size of a pencil. Second, being prey animals, goats also evolved to ejaculate as soon as they penetrate. Third, goats are seasonal breeders and only become excited when they can smell a doe in heat. And while the rut begins in the fall, the first week of September is a bit early for such activities. My own goats are just now starting what could be described as pre-rutting behavior. The does are starting to produce the necessary hormones, but not enough to get the bucks to start trying to go through the fence. Seems like you'd also need someone to guide the goat into the woman, which could be tricky considering both the size of the penis and the speed of the ejaculation, not to mention the general unwillingness of the buck to cooperate with such human manipulation.

Just saying... ;-)

Expand full comment
author

This is excellent information! Thank you very much!

Perhaps the goat is drugged, perhaps its a man dressed as a goat and the drugged woman and watchers don't realize, perhaps the whole scary story is bullsh!t passed around like a game of telephone.

Expand full comment
Sep 6Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Nowadays Morpheous would never have enough time to show you how deep the rabbit hole goes

Expand full comment
author

And when you get that deep, the rabbits get fangs. Thank you for your comment!

Expand full comment
Sep 6Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Oh yeah — one more thing — that girl in the photo with Weinstein. She’s the one in the notorious photo with Oprah, in the sofa, right?

Do we know her name?

Also, in the photo you posted, the woman behind Weinstein bears a creepily close resemblance to the young woman being bagged by Weinstein.

Expand full comment
author

The woman in that notorious photo with Orca Winfrey is Rita Ora. Mockingly referred to as "Rita Oral" on the dank Hollywood gossip blog Crazy Days & Nights. Daiogenes correctly identifies the Weinstein victim at the end of the Substack.

Expand full comment

Wow they look like the same girl, end the woman behind the Weinstein toad in the bottom pic looks like an older version of the same. What a demon that hideous pig was. And is.

Expand full comment
Sep 6Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Emma Watson

Expand full comment

Thanks for the reminder to read “Cannibalism, Blood Drinking & High-Adept Satanism.” It puts a lot of puzzle pieces in place regarding the elite’s obsession with trans. I was sad to find out its author passed away a few years ago.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210410113315/http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2021/01/kerth-is-gone/

Expand full comment
author
Sep 8·edited Sep 8Author

I've been trying to track down Kerth Barker for years, and heard he'd died but other than a couple mentions on fringe/obscure conspiracy sites, there really hasn't been any official obituary, or at least not one I've been able to find (perhaps the search engines are all being gamed to hide it). Seems just as likely to me that he had some help and went anonymous and disappeared, or maybe that's just what I'd like to believe. But who knows? I. Know. Nothing.

Either way, thank you very much for this helpful link. I notice the entire Thought Crime Radio website is gone now. R.I.P.

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Some of those goat abusing women were probably given a choice between the goat or Weinstein.

Expand full comment
author

One hell of a choice, for sure. Thank you for your comment.

Expand full comment
Sep 6Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Ok, ok, I ordered the book!

Expand full comment
author

LMK what you think!

Expand full comment
Sep 11Liked by TOM SIEBERT

The book is unsettling but seems logical and genuine from what I can tell. One of the biggest lessons is that these “people” are openly attempting to perfect the things we all do to some degree while lying to ourselves and each other about it. That sinfulness is what gives evil a point of leverage.

Expand full comment
author

Exactly. As my grandfather used to say: "People who are willing to do anything to get ahead always have an advantage over people with a moral compass, who will not." Thank you for your comment, I'm glad to hear somebody read the book.

Expand full comment

If you can find “Camp if the Saints” by Jean Respail, you will never be the same.

Expand full comment

Tim, not kidding, I have a technical question involving the physical properties of a goat…or even biological capacity. Perhaps you mean a demonic testosterone raging male in goat drag?

Expand full comment
author

" Perhaps you mean a demonic testosterone raging male in goat drag?"

Following V. Dominique's comment, as seen above and below, this sounds increasingly likely. Thank you for your comment!

Expand full comment

I just posted a comment regarding the physical difficulties of a mating with a goat and a woman. Here is my "technical" comment.

"Not sure how well it would work with a real buck goat and a woman. First, a goat's penis is the size of a pencil. Second, being prey animals, goats also evolved to ejaculate as soon as they penetrate. Third, goats are seasonal breeders and only become excited when they can smell a doe in heat. And while the rut begins in the fall, the first week of September is a bit early for such activities. My own goats are just now starting what could be described as pre-rutting behavior. The does are starting to produce the necessary hormones, but not enough to get the bucks to start trying to go through the fence. Seems like you'd also need someone to guide the goat into the woman, which could be tricky considering both the size of the penis and the speed of the ejaculation, not to mention the general unwillingness of the buck to cooperate with such human manipulation."

Expand full comment
Sep 6Liked by TOM SIEBERT

Tom, of course, hate auto correct

Expand full comment

I enjoyed hearing about your college days! But...Holy creeeeeeeepy, man!

Expand full comment
author

The weirdest thing about all that, and all that came after, is how much weirder it seems in retrospect as opposed to when it's happening in the moment. At the time, it's more like "I'm not computing this normally, I'm ejecting." Only years later, when I really thought about it, did the level of weirdness really sink in.

Expand full comment
founding

Ephesians 5:11-14

11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. 13 But everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light. 14 This is why it is said:

“Wake up, sleeper,

rise from the dead,

and Christ will shine on you.”

Expand full comment

I should have heeded that triple trigger warning..

Expand full comment
author

I'm sorry. I tried to make it blatant from the get-go. I hope it did not alienate you from further reading. Thank you for sharing your opinion.

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by TOM SIEBERT

No, you did. I kept reading anyways. I really shouldn't be shocked by anything at this point. I grew up on Disney princess movies and loved going to Disneyland. That's of course all been ruined with everything I now know. This was just the nail in that coffin. Keep writing and I'll keep reading!

Expand full comment

You always have such interesting pieces. I love how you connect the dots- even over decades. It’s amazing what you learn when you don’t take life at face value.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you very much for your comment!

Expand full comment