Very hard for me to follow because I don't watch sports or "entertainers" and can't read through the stylized names and meanings.
What I did get and agree with is newsom. I believe kamala will be set up or killed. Old joe will pick newsom as VP, then he will have to step down for some reason like being too senile, ushering newsom into the convention. If you saw what bill mahr recently said about newsom being electable without naming a single accomplishment, you can see democrat party thinking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwAbzMayssU
I'm only going to quibble with you on one thing: Shanahan throwing that game. He sucks as a play caller, THEY didn't need him for the fix, they knew he'd screw up the SB, for a third time.
" ... all the lost research explaining how we got there, all the lost video footage, all the fake and missing moon rocks, all the laughably ridiculous video footage, etc., Whether we went to the moon or not, there’s sure been a lot of circumstantial evidence circulated that we did not. True or false, it almost doesn’t matter; the accomplishment has been tarnished."
All the seeming anomalies in the moon landings have been explained perfectly satisfactorily including the video footage of the LEM ascent. All you have to do is look it up. Yes, I know that so much alleged fact-check is complete hokum but when it comes to the moon landings the explanations are perfectly valid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K67VIbfVPxY
However, it is very true that they have created doubt about them - clearly evidenced in the cartoonish Bill Kaysing, who - completely against reality - they made Head of Technical Publications at Rocketdyne (the company who made the rockets to go to the moon) and had spout complete nonsense, eg, a crater so large should have been created that the astronauts couldn't have got out of it. The reason they've done this is to undermine those who tend to reject their narratives Boy Who Cried Wolf style so when they call out the real lies (most things they say) they will be laughed at as silly "conspiracy theorists". And what's interesting is that no rejecter of the reality of moon landings has noticed that Bill Kaysing couldn't possibly be who he is said to be. The propagandists understand us so much better than we understand ourselves.
"Whether or not 9/11 was an “inside job,” the U.S. government has gone out of its way to create ambiguity about the event — all the still-hidden footage of the plane/rocket/missile hitting the Pentagon, the alleged terrorist’s passport discovered mostly unscathed a few blocks from WTC, the collapse of WTC7, ..."
There is no whether or not, there is clearly a yes, inside job, however, where they've led the rejecters of their preposterous narrative astray is having them believe that while the rest of the story is nonsense PEOPLE DIED! All you have to do is say PEOPLE DIED! and people's minds turn to jelly and they believe it and will say HOW DARE YOU! to anyone who suggests, "No they didn't, that's just all part of the lie too." 9/11 was a demolition job ... and what generally happens in demolitions jobs? The buildings and surrounding areas are FULLY EVACUATED. That's what normally happens and it's hard to get your head around how they would have broken protocol on that day. Besides, they tell us loud and clear underneath the many layers of magic propaganda dust that death and injury were staged - not to say that no one died or was injured, I'd say some people at the very least were injured and maybe a few died but in general we can see without a doubt that death and injury were staged which is only to be expected in a psyop where they didn't want to kill and injure people for real. If they wanna kill them, they will but they didn't want to and it would have been highly problematic involving the people they did to go along with real death and injury when it was just a major element of their terror story.
Reporters outside hospitals report no injured, firefighter testimonies full of nonsensicality, images of injured perfectly consistent with drill injured, a number of alleged victims made-up people ... there is not a single skerrick of evidence that favours the real death and injury hypothesis ... and I challenge anyone to present it.
Their psyops are always done Hidden in Plain Sight - they TELL us ... moreover, they never fake a piece of evidence so well that anyone who believes their story can brandish it in defence of it. We must give them that.
Very hard for me to follow because I don't watch sports or "entertainers" and can't read through the stylized names and meanings.
What I did get and agree with is newsom. I believe kamala will be set up or killed. Old joe will pick newsom as VP, then he will have to step down for some reason like being too senile, ushering newsom into the convention. If you saw what bill mahr recently said about newsom being electable without naming a single accomplishment, you can see democrat party thinking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwAbzMayssU
Besides, look at this moronic fake performance from newsom: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cucX-S2t-0c
It's all in the cards.
I'm only going to quibble with you on one thing: Shanahan throwing that game. He sucks as a play caller, THEY didn't need him for the fix, they knew he'd screw up the SB, for a third time.
Whether or not ... ?
" ... all the lost research explaining how we got there, all the lost video footage, all the fake and missing moon rocks, all the laughably ridiculous video footage, etc., Whether we went to the moon or not, there’s sure been a lot of circumstantial evidence circulated that we did not. True or false, it almost doesn’t matter; the accomplishment has been tarnished."
All the seeming anomalies in the moon landings have been explained perfectly satisfactorily including the video footage of the LEM ascent. All you have to do is look it up. Yes, I know that so much alleged fact-check is complete hokum but when it comes to the moon landings the explanations are perfectly valid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K67VIbfVPxY
However, it is very true that they have created doubt about them - clearly evidenced in the cartoonish Bill Kaysing, who - completely against reality - they made Head of Technical Publications at Rocketdyne (the company who made the rockets to go to the moon) and had spout complete nonsense, eg, a crater so large should have been created that the astronauts couldn't have got out of it. The reason they've done this is to undermine those who tend to reject their narratives Boy Who Cried Wolf style so when they call out the real lies (most things they say) they will be laughed at as silly "conspiracy theorists". And what's interesting is that no rejecter of the reality of moon landings has noticed that Bill Kaysing couldn't possibly be who he is said to be. The propagandists understand us so much better than we understand ourselves.
"Whether or not 9/11 was an “inside job,” the U.S. government has gone out of its way to create ambiguity about the event — all the still-hidden footage of the plane/rocket/missile hitting the Pentagon, the alleged terrorist’s passport discovered mostly unscathed a few blocks from WTC, the collapse of WTC7, ..."
There is no whether or not, there is clearly a yes, inside job, however, where they've led the rejecters of their preposterous narrative astray is having them believe that while the rest of the story is nonsense PEOPLE DIED! All you have to do is say PEOPLE DIED! and people's minds turn to jelly and they believe it and will say HOW DARE YOU! to anyone who suggests, "No they didn't, that's just all part of the lie too." 9/11 was a demolition job ... and what generally happens in demolitions jobs? The buildings and surrounding areas are FULLY EVACUATED. That's what normally happens and it's hard to get your head around how they would have broken protocol on that day. Besides, they tell us loud and clear underneath the many layers of magic propaganda dust that death and injury were staged - not to say that no one died or was injured, I'd say some people at the very least were injured and maybe a few died but in general we can see without a doubt that death and injury were staged which is only to be expected in a psyop where they didn't want to kill and injure people for real. If they wanna kill them, they will but they didn't want to and it would have been highly problematic involving the people they did to go along with real death and injury when it was just a major element of their terror story.
Reporters outside hospitals report no injured, firefighter testimonies full of nonsensicality, images of injured perfectly consistent with drill injured, a number of alleged victims made-up people ... there is not a single skerrick of evidence that favours the real death and injury hypothesis ... and I challenge anyone to present it.
Their psyops are always done Hidden in Plain Sight - they TELL us ... moreover, they never fake a piece of evidence so well that anyone who believes their story can brandish it in defence of it. We must give them that.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-false-dilemma-propaganda